The KDP-PUK disagreement poses new risks

The government crisis, which has been ongoing for more than 20 months, is dragging the Kurdistan Region not only into a political impasse but also into administrative and military division. The search for balance between Erbil and Sulaymaniyah has transcended local politics and turned into a critical breaking point that threatens regional security.

KRG Parliament

Although more than 20 months have passed since the elections held on October 20, 2024, in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, a government has yet to be formed. The political crisis in the region is deepening because no coalition has been formed in the 105-seat parliament that can secure a 50+1 majority.

In the elections held on October 20, 2024, the KDP won 40 seats, the PUK 23, New Generation 16, the Kurdistan Islamic Union (Yekgirtî) 7, Helwest 3, the People’s Front (Berey Gel) 2, and Goran and Komal 3 seats each.

Following the elections, more than 30 rounds of talks between the KDP and the PUK—covering issues such as the redistribution of ministerial portfolios and the election of the president—failed to yield results. Since a new government has not been formed, the government established after the previous election has been operating as an interim government for approximately 20 months. This disagreement between the KDP and the PUK was reflected not only in the Kurdistan Regional Government election but also in the Iraqi presidential election, and due to the Kurds’ divided stance, the Iraqi presidential election has also been prolonged.

KRI Politic and Administrative Activity Map
Yellow Zone: Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP)

The core power and absolute dominance area of the KDP covers the provinces of Erbil (Hewlêr) and Duhok. Since Erbil is the capital of the KRI, the weight of the KDP is also strongly felt at the center of the official administrative structure. At the same time, Zakho and its surroundings, which border Turkey, are under the full control of the KDP.

Green Zone: Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)

The traditional base and political, administrative, and military control point of the PUK consists of the Sulaymaniyah and Halabja provinces. This region runs parallel to the Iranian border, and the PUK administration ensures the security and local governance of these provinces through its own military (70th Brigade) and administrative cadres.

Activity Areas of the Opposition and Other Parties
  • Gorran (Movement for Change): Its birthplace and strongest base is the Sulaymaniyah province. Emerging from within the PUK, this movement remains a factor in Sulaymaniyah politics.
  • New Generation Movement (Naway Nwe): Its headquarters and main base are predominantly in Sulaymaniyah, but it is the current main opposition that resonates across the region, having also successfully appealed to a certain protest vote in Erbil.
  • Islamic Parties: While the Kurdistan Islamic Union (Yekgirtû) maintains a significant presence in the Duhok region, the Kurdistan Justice Group (Komal) is primarily influential around Sulaymaniyah and Halabja.

According to the Iraqi Constitution, which was ratified in 2005, the President is traditionally selected from among the Kurds. Under the agreement between the KDP and the PUK, however, the President of the Kurdistan Region has been selected from the KDP, while the President of Iraq has been selected from the PUK ever since. As the two parties could not reach an agreement on the presidential election, they entered the race with different candidates; the election held on April 11 was won by the PUK’s candidate, Nizar Amedi. The KDP, however, boycotted the election and announced that it did not recognize Nizar Amedi as the representative of Kurdistan.

In a statement issued by the KDP Politburo, it was stated: “The candidate nominated for the office of President has been excluded from Kurdish mechanisms. Yet this office belongs not to a party, but to the people of Kurdistan. However, the candidate in question for this office was designated by a party and endorsed by certain parties affiliated with other components of Iraq. For this reason, we reject this election method and will not recognize a person selected in this manner as the representative of the Kurdish majority, nor will we engage with him.”

Government talks ended in a stalemate

While the Iraqi presidential election was resolved in this manner, the formation of the regional government remained unresolved despite dozens of rounds of talks. According to political conventions in the Kurdistan Region, the office of Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Region has traditionally been shared between the two parties on a two-year rotating basis for each electoral cycle. However, the KDP has not adhered to this convention for some time. The KDP wants to retain the presidencies of the Kurdistan Region and the Prime Minister’s Office. In contrast, the PUK wants more ministerial posts and authority within the government. Until 2023, the KDP was able to form a government by securing a 50 percent majority, including its 11-seat quota. However, in 2023, following a ruling by the Iraqi Federal Court, the number of seats in the Kurdistan Regional Parliament was reduced from 111 to 100, and the number of quota seats was reduced from 11 to 5.

The PUK, which seeks full partnership in the administration of the Kurdistan Region, argues that the KDP has become the decisive factor in decision-making processes and that this has disrupted the political balance.

Along with the disagreement between the parties over control of the Ministry of the Interior and security agencies, the KDP ultimately wants to retain its dominant position in the administration, while the PUK is demanding equal partnership.

This dispute between the KDP and the PUK has brought about numerous negative consequences in the Kurdistan Region. While political, economic, and social crises—including the non-payment of salaries—are being experienced due to the failure to form a government, the resolution of issues between Baghdad and the Kurdistan Region is constantly being postponed due to the fragmented state of relations with the central government.

Influential Figures of KRI Politics
Masoud Barzani

Masoud Barzani

President of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP)

The former president of the Kurdistan Region and the historical leader of the KDP. Although he holds no official government post, he remains the most powerful political figure who makes the ultimate decisions in the Yellow Zone (Erbil-Duhok) and across regional politics.

Nechirvan Barzani

Nechirvan Barzani

President of KRI & Vice President of KDP

The current president of the region. He plays a key role particularly in Erbil-centered diplomacy, managing relations with Baghdad and Ankara, and balancing regional crises between the KDP and PUK.

Bafel Talabani

Bafel Talabani

President of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK)

The de facto leader of the Green Zone (Sulaymaniyah-Halabja). By putting an end to internal party rivalries, he consolidated the PUK’s military (70th Brigade) and intelligence power into a single hand, becoming the main actor defending the autonomy of Sulaymaniyah against Erbil’s policies.

Shaswar Abdulwahid

Shaswar Abdulwahid

Leader of the New Generation Movement (Naway Nwe)

A media mogul and politician based in Sulaymaniyah. By directing harsh criticisms against the traditional duopoly of the KDP and PUK, he forms the current center for anti-establishment and protest votes in both regions.

The alliance between the PUK and the new generation movement

Following prolonged and fruitless negotiations between the KDP and the PUK, the PUK and the New Generation Movement decided in recent months to work together in parliament. Although this alliance—which, with a total of 38 seats, brought the number of seats close to that of the KDP in the Kurdistan Regional Parliament and partially shifted the balance of power—did not reach the number needed to form a government, the merger of these two Sulaymaniyah-based movements against the KDP has created a new balance of power. Indeed, it appears that the two parties have secured significant influence by also deciding to work together in the Iraqi Parliament.

Following the agreement reached between the PUK and the New Generation Movement, PUK Chairman Bafıl Talabani stated that they wished to reach an agreement with the KDP and form a government as soon as possible, while New Generation Movement Leader Şaswar Abdulvahid conveyed that the premiership should go to someone outside the KDP, signaling that they were aligned with the PUK. The KDP, however, despite leaving all alliance proposals in limbo, is citing the PUK as the reason for the failure to form a government. KDP Spokesperson Mahmud Muhammed, in a statement made a few days ago, accused the PUK of obstructing the process, saying, “It is the PUK itself that is disregarding the people’s vote and will, imposing itself on the election results through coercion, and failing to take into account the number of votes and seats won by the parties.”

KDP: We are the true representatives

Noting that the KDP received more votes than the PUK in both the Kurdistan Parliament and the Iraqi Council of Representatives elections, Muhammad stated that the KDP is the true representative of the people, while the PUK, with only 23 seats, represents only its own voters.

Military crisis: The failure to unify the Peshmerga

In addition to this political crisis between the KDP and the PUK, there is also the issue of unifying the Peshmerga, which can be viewed as a military crisis. Both parties have their own separate armed forces, namely the Peshmerga. The process of unifying the Peshmerga forces affiliated with both parties, which began in 2010, resulted in the formation of 14 brigades by 2013 through the unification of 42,000 Peshmerga fighters; however, the unification process subsequently stalled. In 2018, with the support and pressure of the international coalition formed against ISIS, this process resumed but has yet to reach a conclusion. Tom Barrack, the U.S.’s new representative for Iraq and Syria, announced a new U.S. regional policy—the “one army, one central structure” doctrine—and has been attempting to implement it. There has been discussion that the Peshmerga would be integrated into the Iraqi army under this doctrine, but this claim was denied by the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs and the KDP.

Mela Bahtiyar: “The consequences will be severe”

Mela Bahtiyar, a prominent Kurdish politician in the politics of Federal Kurdistan and Iraq, warned in a recent statement to Rudaw that the political consequences of failing to form a government would be severe. Noting that the current situation has weakened the position of the Federal Kurdistan Region, Bahtiyar said that there are effectively two separate areas in the region. Recalling that the Peshmerga forces, the police force, and various public institutions have not been fully integrated for years, Bahtiyar said, “Our government cannot appoint even a single civil servant from Koye to Xaneqîn without consulting the PUK, nor can the PUK deploy a single soldier from Koye to Zaxo without consulting the KDP.”

“The U.S. Determines the Representative”

Bahtiyar noted that the U.S. supports a strong and unified state structure in Iraq, and that the Washington administration wants to see a unified army, a unified financial system, and strong central institutions, adding that resolving the issues between the Kurdistan Region and Baghdad is therefore crucial. Noting that if the KDP and the PUK fail to overcome their current disagreements, external actors could become more involved in the process, Bahtiyar added: “It would be better if they resolved it, but if they don’t, I believe the U.S. will ultimately decide for itself who the Kurds’ representative will be. It would be best for them to resolve it before the situation reaches that point.”

The regional government, which has not been formed for over 20 months due to the two parties’ inability to reach an agreement, is causing serious economic and political problems in the Kurdistan Region while also leaving the region vulnerable to interference by neighboring states.

KRI Political System: Chronology and Structural Analysis
Emergence and Chronology of the Political System
  • 1946: The Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) was founded in Mahabad by Mustafa Barzani.
  • 1970: The “March 11 Autonomy Accord” was signed between Kurdish leaders and the Iraqi government.
  • 1975: The Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) was established under the leadership of Jalal Talabani.
  • 1991: Following the First Gulf War, the Raperin (uprising) took place. A de facto autonomy was created as the UN declared the area north of the 36th parallel a “No-Fly Zone.”
  • 1992: The first parliamentary elections were held in the region. The KDP and PUK shared a 50-50 power balance in parliament, and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) was de facto established.
  • 1994 – 1998: As a result of the civil war (Brakujî) between the KDP and PUK, the region was administratively split into two (Erbil and Sulaymaniyah).
  • 2003: The Ba’ath regime was overthrown by the US invasion of Iraq; Peshmerga forces acted in coordination with the coalition.
  • 2005: With the new Iraqi Constitution, the Kurdistan Region gained official legal (de jure) status as a “federal region.”
  • 2006: The KDP and PUK administrations merged to form a unified government.
  • 2009: The Gorran (Change) Movement was founded, breaking the two-party hegemony.
  • 2014 – 2017: During the war against ISIS, the Peshmerga secured control over disputed territories, including Kirkuk.
  • 2017: An Independence Referendum was held, after which the Iraqi army reclaimed Kirkuk and other disputed territories.
  • 2024: The postponed Kurdistan Parliamentary elections were carried out in October.
Active Political Forces and Dominance Zones
  • Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP): Dominant in Erbil and Duhok provinces (“Yellow Zone”). Its military backbone is the 80th Brigade.
  • Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK): Dominant in Sulaymaniyah and Halabja provinces (“Green Zone”). Its military backbone is the 70th Brigade.
  • New Generation Movement (Naway Nwe): The region’s main current opposition party, challenging the KDP-PUK duopoly.
  • Gorran: The Sulaymaniyah-based former primary opposition movement.
  • Islamic Parties: The Kurdistan Islamic Union (Yekgirtû) and the Kurdistan Justice Group (Komal) are the conservative forces represented in parliament.
Regional and International Relations Equation
  • Iraqi Central Government (Baghdad): Relations revolve around the federal budget share, public servant salaries, energy exports, and the status of disputed territories under “Article 140.”
  • Turkey: Maintains strong commercial, political, and energy (Ceyhan pipeline) ties primarily with Erbil. Military operations against the PKK form a core part of the relationship dynamics.
  • Iran: Exerts high historical and political influence in the PUK-controlled area along its border. It intervenes in regional developments through military pressure directed at its own dissident Iranian-Kurdish parties.
  • US and International Coalition: Maintains security-focused relations. They provide funding and training aimed at unifying the Peshmerga forces into a non-partisan, institutional army.
What Do They Want? (Core Political Demands)
  • Implementation of Article 140: Holding referendums in Kirkuk and other disputed areas to finalize whether these zones will officially attach to Erbil or Baghdad.
  • Financial Guarantees: Ensuring uninterrupted payments of public servant and Peshmerga salaries by Baghdad.
  • Energy Independence: Securing recognized authority to manage regional oil and gas resources, or receiving a fair share of the generated national revenues.
What Are They Doing? (Current Activities)
  • Conducting intra-party and inter-party negotiations aimed at forming a new coalition government following the October 2024 elections.
  • Advancing reform initiatives to unify party-controlled military units under a single Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs.
  • Engaging in technical talks with Baghdad to coordinate the payment of civil servant salaries through banking systems (Tawtin/MyAccount projects).
  • Executing coordinated operations with the Iraqi army against ISIS sleeper cells in disputed territories experiencing security gaps.

Berlin’s “Socialists Cemetery”: The dead warn us!

In the Socialists’ Cemetery, the revolutionaries of the German Socialist Movement engraved in the history books lie side by side with nameless heroes.

Photo: Wikipedia

As you walk through the silence of a large park in Berlin’s Friedrichsfelde district, you come across three words engraved on a stone: “Die Toten mahnen uns.” In English, “The dead warn us.” With this phrase, you suddenly feel as though an entirely different era has begun, with slogans and marches echoing around you; this is Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde. In other words, the Socialists’ Cemetery

When the Berlin Municipality purchased this 25-hectare site in 1880, it commissioned landscape architect Hermann Mächtig to design the area as a garden cemetery. At the time of its opening, it became the first municipal cemetery open to all Berliners, regardless of faith. No distinction was made between rich and poor… The city’s poor were buried here, with the municipality covering their funeral expenses. For this reason, it came to be known as the “Armenfriedhof,” meaning the “Cemetery of the Poor.”

On one side, the cemetery is home to the well-kept and magnificent tombs of the city’s wealthy families, while on the other lie the graves of thousands of poor Berliners, some lacking even a name… Here, those whose only possession in life was their bodies are “equalized” with the rich in death.

And it is also here that the revolutionaries of the German Socialist Movement, etched into history books, lie side by side with nameless heroes.

A red marble plaque inscribed with the names of 327 men and women who died fighting against fascism between 1933 and 1945. Photo / Wikipedia
The Funeral That Changed the Cemetery’s Fate

August 7, 1900… Wilhelm Liebknecht, one of the pioneers of the German Socialist movement, suffered a stroke while returning home after working late at the socialist newspaper Vorwärts, which he had been an editor for years, and died at the age of 74. On August 12, Berlin witnessed one of the largest funerals in its history. Tens of thousands of people joined the procession stretching from the city center to Friedrichsfelde Cemetery.

This ceremony and the crowd in attendance did not merely bid farewell to Liebknecht. They also altered the cemetery’s fate. Liebknecht’s burial here instantly transformed Friedrichsfelde into a shrine for the labor movement. His grave, standing like a monument, became a gathering point for generations of social democrats, socialists, and anti-fascists. Subsequently, other leaders of the labor movement, such as Ignaz Auer, Paul Singer, Carl Legien, and Theodor Leipart, were also laid to rest here. Thus, Friedrichsfelde took on the name “Socialists’ Cemetery” and was cemented into the symbolic map of the people’s struggle in Berlin. Thereafter, each new burial added new layers of meaning to the cemetery, accompanied by inscriptions carved into stones and newly erected statues. Each statue became a silent but screaming manifesto.

Rosa is Here: “I Was, I Am, I Shall Be”

January 1919 was a time when the streets of Berlin became the scene of the Spartacist Uprising, echoing with clashes between the Spartacists and Freikorps units (paramilitary forces). On January 15, 1919, more than a hundred revolutionaries, including Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, were massacred by Freikorps troops. Some died in clashes, while others were executed by firing squad in extrajudicial killings…

The ceremony attended by high-ranking East German leaders to commemorate Rosa Luxemburg in January 1989. Photo / Wikipedia

The bodies of Karl Liebknecht and 33 others were buried in the Socialists’ Cemetery on January 25. Karl was now in the same cemetery as his father, Wilhelm Liebknecht. Rosa, however, was made to disappear after being killed. It took months to find her body. She was eventually found in May 1919 in the Landwehr Canal, where she had been thrown, and was buried in this cemetery. Rosa was one of the revolutionaries that the fascists feared the most, so that they wanted her body to be lost and for her to be forgotten. But they failed. Rosa is now in the Socialists’ Cemetery, and through her final article, she declares: “Tomorrow, the revolution will already rise up resoundingly and proclaim to your horror with trumpets: I was, I am, I shall be!

Destruction and Reconstruction

The year 1926 marked a new turning point for the Socialists’ Cemetery. On June 13, 1926, the “Revolutionsdenkmal” (Monument to the Revolution) was unveiled. Built as a red brick cube, it symbolized the resilience of the revolutionary movement and the revolutionaries who were lined up against a wall and executed by a firing squad. However, the Nazi regime destroyed this memorial of the revolution with dynamite in 1935.

Following the Second World War, the German Democratic Republic (GDR), established in East Berlin, sought to once again glorify the symbols of the labor movement. On January 14, 1951, a new site was opened in the center of the Socialists’ Cemetery: the “Gedenkstätte der Sozialisten” (Memorial to the Socialists). A large porphyry stone was erected right in the middle of the memorial. Only three words are inscribed on the obelisk: “Die Toten mahnen uns” (The dead warn us.) A simple, brief sentence, yet one that strikes every reader to the core…

The monument, designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in 1926 and built in memory of the fallen Spartacists, was destroyed by the Third Reich after 1935. Photo / Wikipedia

During the GDR era, the monument became an indispensable venue for state ceremonies. In the final years of East Germany, while the cemetery became a burial ground for party elites and the state bureaucracy, it was closed to new burials following the fall of the Berlin Wall and reunification of Germany. The existing graves remain standing, preserving history like a stone memory.

The Call Echoing in the Silence

Although the crowds at the official ceremonies held in the Socialists’ Cemetery dwindled after the fall of the Berlin Wall, thousands of people still come here every January, braving the cold, to commemorate Rosa and Karl. The graves of the 327 anti-fascists in the outer semicircle of the cemetery, who took part in resistance networks during the Hitler era, are not forgotten either. Among them are workers, trade unionists, teachers, and ordinary people. Ordinary, but brave people…

The sentence carved in stone continues to ring in the ears of visitors leaving the cemetery: “The dead warn us!” This is not merely a reminder. It is a call that carries the lessons of the past into today and tomorrow. And everyone asks themselves this question: Do the dead in our geography warn us too?

Privacy overview

Niha+ respects your digital footprint within the framework of independent journalism principles and reader privacy. While browsing our site, cookies are used to provide you with an uninterrupted reading experience and to secure the technical infrastructure of our platform. You can manage your cookie preferences as you wish by using the menu on the left. For detailed information on how your personal data is processed, please review our Privacy Agreement and KVKK Clarification Text.